On September 28, 2018, California governor Jerry Brown signed into law the Information Privacy: Connected Devices Act, CA SB 327/AB 1906. The law requires that any connected device sold in California after January 1, 2020 must implement “reasonable” security measures. Despite the understated fanfare, this law will set in motion a series of events that will be monumental for IoT.
We haven't posted in a while, but that doesn't mean we haven't been hard at work. In April we joined the Alchemist Accelerator as a swappable modem hardware company. We're now a software IoT security company. We announced it to the investor world at Alchemist Demo Day on Tuesday September 19, 2017 and got written up in TechCrunch. A lot of people are calling it a "pivot." We're just view it as a quicker way to bring our value proposition to IoT. Let me explain why.
HSPA, LTE Cat 1, LTE Cat M, NB-IoT, Wi-Fi, Zigbee 802.15.4, Zwave, Sigfox, LoRa, RPMA, Weightless, and BT-LE are just a few wireless technologies vying for your IoT device, and this doesn't even include satellite networks. Are all these networks really going to survive? Why can't IoT adhere to the "Highlander Principle" (there can be only one)? To answer these questions, we need to learn about a theory developed during World War II.
It is not uncommon for manufacturers to spend months evaluating communication options before starting a device design, and then change course several times during development as new information is uncovered or new technologies start getting deployed. This series of articles will hopefully reduce both planning time and design rework. In this first post we overview all the factors that affect the choice of communication technology.